How to Create the New Product

Back Cover page-001

We say the new product, not a, because we don’t want to put just one more literary journal out on the market. We want a product so different and exciting it’ll blow people away from the moment they see it– let alone read it.

This means starting with a dynamite cover. Our “packaging.” Nearly all lit journals today have professional-looking cover art. Our task was to best this.

We did this by in-depth research of the best artists, of all kinds, in the Detroit area. We preferred having a Detroit artist A.) for the hipness/edge factor B.) because Detroit is the center right now of an arts explosion; fantastically talented artists gravitating to the coming-back city for the opportunity it provides– and the city’s edgy-jagged atmosphere.

We didn’t limit our search to Michigan folks. We perused work online from as far away as Liverpool– which itself seems to be an arts hub right now.

From graffiti artists to designers of comic books or posters or album cover art, we cast a wide net. We desired not simply good art– but trailblazing art. Several very good options were out there. We settled on the best local young artist, in our humble opinion. Or at least, the artist whose work was the most colorful, most pop, most striking. Most attention getting. It grabbed our attention! That artist was Alyssa Klash.

The cover’s a winner. But what of the “product” itself? The literary journal’s contents?

Aha! For that we had no worries. We’d already published on our web site (www.newpoplit.com) several terrific writers– from Thomas Mundt and Jessie Lynn  McMains to Kathleen Crane and Brittany Terwilliger and Wred Fright. We pushed them to send us stories that were even better than those they’d previously given us. They came through big-time.

To those returnees we added newbies (for us) like Robin Dunn and Terry Sanville, and the quirky/crazy lit phenomenon Alex Bernstein. In addition, we had a very strong interview with purveyor of DIY everything Delphine Pontvieux, AND a series of art/prose pieces by Dan Nielsen, who has since joined the staff of this fledgling-but-ambitious project. (More about him in another blog post.) Who are we leaving out? Our token poet, Colin James. One poem– but it’s a good one, holding its own with the dynamite stories around it.

We don’t exaggerate about the stories. You’ll see when you read them. They’re as good as any stories being published anywhere. (We believe two of them are better than any stories being published anywhere.) Moreover, they fit our aesthetic. We designed this journal for the new reader. The stories are fast, fun, and have punch. They are NOT for people with endless time on their hands to dawdle for hundreds of pages over going-nowhere prose from the likes of a Jonathan Franzen or Hilary Mantel. Our stories are too good, too exciting, for the mandarins of a collapsing literary establishment. Our stories are for people on the move themselves, living in the NOW. For people who themselves are creating excitement, and will not settle for less than the best in beer, brunches, styles, or literary products. (Yes, our new literary journal has style.)

Not that we didn’t have difficulties putting our hybrid new animal together. Formatting it took longer than we expected. Not to worry! We WILL have a limited number of preview copies at the Allied Media Conference coming up. A chance to grab an advance look at what the literary future looks like. If you’re attending, get to our table early!

-K.W.

NEW POP LIT Print Issue #1 Is Coming!

NPL Cover two

WHAT will the print version of New Pop Lit look like? We’re not sure! All we know is that Detroit’s most kickass young artist, Alyssa Klash, has done the cover for us. We also know that the issue will contain dynamic– no, nuclear– writing of the like you’ve never seen. We guarantee it!

Underground legend Jessie Lynn McMains has provided a story about two young women that’s stronger than anything by Mary Gaitskill at her best.

Chicago’s best story writer Thomas Mundt has given us as bizarre and well-written a tale as you’ve ever read.

A host of other fantastic writers will be presented; talents like Terry Sanville, Kathleen Crane, Robin Dunn, Colin James, Wred Fright, Brittany Terwilliger, Dan Nielsen– each writer unique; exploring the idea of pop literature in an original way. And more.

We intended our first issue to be unlike any literary journal ever seen. A new direction. Literature produced with a DIY attitude and a zine edge.

NEW POP LIT The Print Version will debut in Detroit June 19th at the Allied Media Conference. Watch for it!

Reinventing the Short Story

WE KEEP ASKING and will continue to ask: What should the new short story look like? We ask writers of all varieties to address this question from the standpoint of the reader. This is our starting point. What does the general public want to read? What will hook everyone and anyone to read short fiction? More, what will make the short story as essential to every individual’s life as pop (or other) music is now?

Create the new. Put onto paper what you’ve never thought of doing before– then send us the result:

newpoplit@gmail.com

Start writing!

Questions for Wred Fright!

Wred Fright

Today we throw a few impromptu questions at zine superstar Dr. Wred Fright, hoping to catch him off guard. How will he respond?

************************

QUESTION #1: Do you have a favorite short story writer living or dead?

ANSWER: I do not have a single favorite short story writer as I like too many to pick just one.  However, I will name a few for anyone looking for a good read.  I recently reread a book of stories by P. G. Wodehouse and enjoyed them quite a bit, though it was easy to see his winning formula at work when reading a bunch in a row (better to read one at a time).  And, just today, I read “The Egg” by Sherwood Anderson and was reminded of just how good a writer he was.  Among Americans, I’d say the three best in the last century were Carver, Hemingway, and O’Connor, but with so many fine writers to choose from, that’s certainly quite debatable.  Worldwide, Borges, Joyce, and Murakami come to mind.  I’m also a little puzzled that the Nobel folks apparently think that Alice Munro is a better writer than Margaret Atwood.  Not only are Atwood’s stories more interesting, but she’s a more versatile writer overall.

QUESTION #2: Who will save Cleveland: Lebron James, Johnny Manziel, or you?

ANSWER: I gave up on Cleveland sports when my fellow citizens reauthorized a sin tax so I can pay more for beer and the team owners can have more money to pay men millions of dollars to play children’s games, so I have no opinion on whether it will be LeBron or Johnny saving Cleveland. Given the history of local sports, I would forecast more disappointment, but I hope that I am wrong. It also probably won’t be me; I’m only here by happenstance and have little interest in the area anymore, though I remain somewhat oddly fond of it. Cleveland could probably save itself if the people here would quit being so corrupt, incompetent, and insular (hey, even changing two of the three might work). My best local illustration of what it’s like to live here is a recent murder of a barowner, in which the leading citizenry of the area did their best to rally not for stamping down on crime or ending the poverty that can lead to it, but for convincing people that they should be sure to patronize the restaurants and shops in the neighborhood of the murder. I was reminded of the idiocy of George Bush when he encouraged people to go shopping to support the war on terror. Money apparently trumps everything else in America anymore (maybe it always did), even basic decency and sense, and Ohio is essentially America in miniature.

QUESTION #3: Should the UFC’s Ronda Rousey fight Cris Cyborg?

ANSWER: I don’t follow UFC, so I also have no opinion on Rousey and Cyborg (based on non-answers such as these, I apparently am approaching Zen enlightenment or complete apathy–in any case, I apologize, as the questions were good). People actually trying to hurt one another is disturbing and hurts my delicate artistic feelings (which is better, at least, than getting kicked in the head). I figured out that I pretty much only like wrestling because it allows me to tap into the reptilian part of my brain that enjoys competition and violence while actively subverting and ridiculing that aspect with the cartoonish humor and underlying ballet where the opponents are actually working together. Maybe it’s the same in UFC, but they’re better at hiding the strings. I don’t know, but I like Brock Lesnar much more when Paul Heyman does his talking for him.

*************************

Wred Fright is the author of the two novels, The Pornographic Flabbergasted Emus and Blog Love Omega Glee. For more information about him, please visit http://www.wredfright.com

(Watch for Wred’s pop story, “Brian Moves Back,” soon to be posted at our main site, http://www.newpoplit.com)

The Hilary Mantel Fiasco

NEW POP LIT NEWSROOM

The latest big news in the literary world is the simultaneous publication on Friday, September 19, in both The Guardian and The New York Times Book Review, of a story by esteemed establishment writer Hilary Mantel, “The Assassination of Margaret Thatcher.” The story is a way for both newspapers to promote Mantel’s new book of short stories, released under the same title as the story.

There are FIVE questionable points about Hilary Mantel’s story and its publication.

1.) The appearance of monopolistic behavior by the two gigantic book conglomerates behind the book’s publication, HarperCollins (via Fourth Estate) in the United Kingdom, and Macmillan Group (via Henry Holt) in the United States. These are two of the “Big Five” conglomerates accusing Amazon of monopolistic behavior. It seems bad timing for these two giants to combine with the two most influential newspapers on the planet in the same-day hyping of a single author. Some could say it’s evidence of the insular and cronyistic nature of the old-style legacy publishing world.

What does monopoly look like?

2.) What short story masterpiece could’ve brought about this combination of powerful forces? Surely it must be a tale for the ages.

Yet when one reads the actual story, “The Assassination of Margaret Thatcher,” one is captured by its relentless mediocrity. It’s a classic  example of contemporary literary banality. The title is the only striking thing about it.

At his blog, NEW POP LIT’s Karl Wenclas has penned this quick takedown of Hilary Mantel’s not-very impressive achievement:

http://kingwenclas.blogspot.com/2014/09/dueling-assassins.html

3.) The question has to be asked, because conservative commentators will surely ask it (or not; HarperCollins is owned by Rupert Murdoch): Is “The Assassination of Margaret Thatcher” merely a cheap political hit piece on one of the icons of conservative thought? Given the way The Guardian is spotlighting Hilary Mantel’s “boiling detestation” of Ms. Thatcher, the writer comes across more as an axe-grinding (or axe-wielding) ideologue than a serious author. Which raises question number four.

Hilary Mantel

4.) Have both Guardian Books and the New York Times Book Review displayed spectacularly poor judgment in promoting this story? It has the air of desperation on the part of supporters of the tottering mainstream publishing world. Beyond seeking to manufacture sales for the conglomerates, they appear to be attempting to manufacture controversy– which is particularly unseemly, and not a position these two prestigious news giants should be in. A related question: Are they objective newspapers, or glorified advertisers? (Or, how much ad space is bought in the Guardian and the Book Review by Macmillan and HarperCollins?)

5.) Why are no other literary sites covering the monopolistic aspects of this story? Where are the editors of The Millions, n+1, Electric Literature, and others? Are they that wedded to support of the publishing status quo that they won’t touch this matter?

-KW